Comments on: Hibernate Vs JDBC Performance Comparison

By: nAn

nAn — Mon, 18 Jan 2010 01:21:11 +0000

I sure hope that all IT Spice articles aren’t as useless and misrepresenting as this so-called article is. Waste of time coming here.

By: Nesh Lalchandani

Nesh Lalchandani — Wed, 02 Dec 2009 05:58:01 +0000

I think the title should have been “Hibernate Vs JDBC” or “Hibernate and JDBC Comparison”

The current title gives me the impression that some parallel tests were done on applications that runs on Hibernate and another one on JDBC.

Still an informative article for newbies.

By: sunil

sunil — Tue, 01 Dec 2009 07:41:27 +0000

one of the worst articles i have read in recent times. –10

By: Ashitkin Alexander

Ashitkin Alexander — Mon, 30 Nov 2009 19:31:41 +0000

and there is performance comparison? such incredible professional and nothing interesting

By: madhu

madhu — Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:37:17 +0000

Hibernate becomes inferior to jdbc when the performace of accessing large amount of data accessed from the databse

By: Hibernate Vs JDBC Performance Comparison | itSpice.net Hello CMS - the best cms website

Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:26:54 +0000

By: Roman

Roman — Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:22:53 +0000

I was reading this article because of it’s title “Hibernate Vs JDBC Performance Comparison”. But there’s not a single performance issue discussed here. That’s the actual problem of Hibernate, almost anything else is fine and clear. Any chance you do a real performance comparison?